Skip to main content

Why We All Need Christmas Trees and Easter Eggs


Many years ago I had some friends at university who were against Christmas. 'It's not in the Bible,' they argued. Well, possibly. The festival at least is not actually in the Bible. So how did we come to celebrate Christmas and Easter in the ways we do now?

Part of the answer is that we continued some practices from our previous, pagan religion. Churches were built next to sacred trees. The winter festival was redeemed and became Christmas, along with the Christmas trees, which might have come later, but are definitely not in the Bible. Similarly the spring festival was redeemed and became Easter, though this actually coincides with the Jewish Passover festival when a lamb was sacrificed in remembrance of the redemption of the people Israel from Egypt, (John 19.14 cf. Exo 12ff).

What my friends were against is the mixing of our previous paganism and our current Christianity into one, syncretistic modern day religion, with all of its feasts and fasts.

I would argue that we all need such festivals:

  • The Israelites had many feasts and fasts in their calendar
  • It helps provide a rhythm in our communities and family lives
  • When first initiated, it provided continuity with past rhythms
In fact, the same process of adoption and adaptation of previous practices, what some missiologists call 'redeeming' a previous practice, is still occurring today throughout the world. In Africa and Asia the big issue is how to continue ancestor worship practices after conversion to Christianity without simply mixing previous traditional religion with today's Christianity. Korea is the big success story, partly due to the fact that they managed to carry out this transition reasonably successfully, despite some initial losses: 

"How has Korean Christianity coped with ancestor worship? The Korean Protestant Church resisted being syncretised with shamanistic ancestor worship. As a result many Christians were martyred. In an attempt to accommodate the social and traditional elements required by Korean culture, the Korean Christian Church instituted the memorial service as an alternative. This meant that the Korean Protestant Church was able to meet the moral and social functions previously fulfilled by ancestor worship while eliminating the religious elements of ancestor worship without compromising the principles of the Gospel. In other words, ancestor worship in the Korean Church was transformed into the Koreanised memorial service which served the indigenous culture."*

This, in contrast to Africa, where, partly due to a lack of contextualisation by Mission workers, Christianity has simply become a more formal layer on top of Christianity: 

"Unfortunately, many Western missionaries who came to Africa were unaware of the African worldview. Influenced by the philosophies of the age of Enlightenment, these missionaries readily dismissed the spirit world as being nothing more than a figment of the imagination. This left most African converts with no biblical teaching in relation to the spirit world, thereby leaving a huge gap in the faith of the African Christian. [...] This helps explain why in many cases African converts return to traditional beliefs as occasion arises with remarkable ease Conversion to Christianity does not answer their deep religious questions. Christianity is just a overlay on their original religious beliefs."**

The fact that, after a struggle, the Korean church managed to replaced Ancestor Worship with a memorial service, helped the community move onto a balanced Christian view of the world, where ancestors are shown proper respect, but Christ is the only one worshipped. Perhaps Christmas trees and Easter eggs did the same for us, some 1800 years ago? 

Image by Pexels from Pixabay

* Bae, Choon Sup, ‘Ancestor Worship and the Challenges It Poses to the Christian Mission and Ministry’ (University of Praetoria, 2007), p. 74.
** Salala, Charles, ‘The World of Spirits: Basukuma Traditional Religion and Biblical Christianity’, in Issues in African Theology, ed. by Samuel Ngewa, Mark Shaw, and Tite Tienou (Nairobi, Kenya: East African Educational Publishers, 1998), p. 137.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scripture Engagement for Translation Advisors

What do translation advisors need to know about Scripture engagement (SE), and why? Let's look at the 'why' first: Translation advisors (TAs) are often involved in day-to-day exegesis. They help mother-tongue translators (MTTs) prepare drafts. The MTTs they work with might not know Hebrew or Greek. The TAs then take part in the team check of that draft, which involves other MTTs in the project as well as the TA. Sometimes they are also involved in the coordination of the translation programme. They are very busy people. So why do they need to know about SE? Because: The translation is ultimately for an audience that has felt needs that are not being addressed by the translation programme. Analysing and meeting (or helping to meet) the felt needs of the audience should be the first priority of any mission worker, including TAs. Only about 30% of completed translations are well used. The initial set up of the programme needs to take SE into consideration (it's no good wai...
Post a Comment
Read more

One Person's Contextualisation is Another Person's Syncretism

I was in an interesting discussion full of anthropologists the other day. They were discussing syncretism. Most of them were of the view that outsiders cannot decide which practices are syncretistic and which are not. It has to be a decision made by local believers. This is because only local people can create indigenous theologies, that is, interpret Scripture according to the local worldview(s).  Not only that, some practices need to be tolerated in the short term, as we trust that new believers will gradually mature, and realise that those practices need to be weaned out of their lives. This can take time, perhaps years. Outsiders can, however, help local believers through the process of deciding for themselves which practices need to be rejected, which can be accepted, and which need to be modified according to (local formed) principles from Scripture. For example, ancestor practices, which my PhD thesis was on, are often continued by people after they have come to faith. They...
Post a Comment
Read more

Asset Based Bible Translation (ABBT)

Many of you will have heard of asset-based community development (ABCD). How can Bible translation programmes be asset based, rather than deficit based? The best way to look at this is a comparison table: Deficit based Asset based Driven by outsiders Driven by the community Outside funding Community funded Done to meet a need Done to help the community grow Quality control done by a consultant Community checked and approved Control from outside-in Lead by stepping back Products not accepted? Products are accepted Little engagement Engagement with products Scientific Organic Not sustainable Sustainable Of course many translation programmes these days are neither one nor t'other, they are somewhere between these two extremes. Nevertheless, this illustrates a point, and shows that the current ...
Post a Comment
Read more