Skip to main content

What Jesus Really Did in the Temple Courts

When they arrived back in Jerusalem, Jesus entered the Temple and began to drive out the people buying and selling animals for sacrifices. He knocked over the tables of the money changers and the chairs of those selling doves, and he stopped everyone from using the Temple as a marketplace. He said to them, “The Scriptures declare, ‘My Temple will be called a house of prayer for all nations,’ but you have turned it into a den of thieves.” Mrk 11:15-17 (NLT)

What made Jesus so angry when he saw people selling pigeons and such like in the court of the Gentile nations? It was because this was the part of the temple set aside for all nations (other than Jews), and they were turning into a Jewish market-place, so making it impossible for those from the nations to pray.

'This notice indicates that Jesus expelled the merchants from the Court of the Gentiles in order to safeguard rights and privileges sanctioned by God. The use of the forecourt as an open market effectually prevented the one area of the Temple which was available to the Gentiles from being a place of prayer.'

Note too, that the term often translated 'Gentiles' is ethnos in Greek, from which we get the phrase 'ethnic group'. English translations tend to translate ethnos 'nations' when the context is positive, as it is here, and 'Gentiles' when it is negative. This is a pity, as it obscures the fact that Gentiles aren't simply non-Jews (a religious focus), but people from all nations (an inclusive focus).

The Scripture Jesus quotes is from Isaiah, which is probably the strongest on mission in the Old Testament. The actual verse is Isaiah 56:7. It's worth reading in context:

      3 Let no foreigner who is bound to the LORD say,
         “The LORD will surely exclude me from his people.”
         And let no eunuch complain,
         “I am only a dry tree.”

4 For this is what the LORD says:

         “To the eunuchs who keep my Sabbaths,
         who choose what pleases me
         and hold fast to my covenant—
      5 to them I will give within my temple and its walls
         a memorial and a name
         better than sons and daughters;
         I will give them an everlasting name
         that will endure forever.
      6 And foreigners who bind themselves to the LORD
         to minister to him,
         to love the name of the LORD,
         and to be his servants,
         all who keep the Sabbath without desecrating it
         and who hold fast to my covenant—
      7 these I will bring to my holy mountain
         and give them joy in my house of prayer.
         Their burnt offerings and sacrifices
         will be accepted on my altar;
         for my house will be called
         a house of prayer for all nations.”
      8 The Sovereign LORD declares—
         he who gathers the exiles of Israel:
         “I will gather still others to them
         besides those already gathered.”

What a wonderfully positive passage, given how much the Jews had suffered under the Babylonians, been sent into exile, some had returned, and were now living in fear of those around them! Despite all these political and other pressures, Isaiah was still keen to see the mission of God fulfilled, as stated to Abraham in Genesis 12.

      2 “I will make you into a great nation,
         and I will bless you;
         I will make your name great,
         and you will be a blessing. i
      3 I will bless those who bless you,
         and whoever curses you I will curse;
         and all peoples on earth
         will be blessed through you.”

This is one of the main over-arching themes of the Bible, yet often it is ignored by preachers, who prefer to focus on the here and now of how 'I' feel. Yet the 'I' is part of a 'we', and the 'we' is part of God's plan for many generations and for people from all nations.

References:

Tyndale House Publishers, Holy Bible: New Living Translation (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2015), p. Mk 11:15–17

Lane, William L., The Gospel of Mark, The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1974), p. 406

The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), p. Is 56:3–8

The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), p. Ge 12:2–3
Labels:

Comments

  1. Maija25 January 2020 at 03:17

    I like the insights here, David, thank you, of Jesus fervently making space for other ethnicity-groups to take place in His Father´s court, to have their legal place given back to them. It inspires us to continue to do the same -inviting those who have legal right to worship in Father´s courts, even if not from Jewish origin. I hope you can soon deliver thoughtful sermons on this topic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scripture Engagement for Translation Advisors

What do translation advisors need to know about Scripture engagement (SE), and why? Let's look at the 'why' first: Translation advisors (TAs) are often involved in day-to-day exegesis. They help mother-tongue translators (MTTs) prepare drafts. The MTTs they work with might not know Hebrew or Greek. The TAs then take part in the team check of that draft, which involves other MTTs in the project as well as the TA. Sometimes they are also involved in the coordination of the translation programme. They are very busy people. So why do they need to know about SE? Because: The translation is ultimately for an audience that has felt needs that are not being addressed by the translation programme. Analysing and meeting (or helping to meet) the felt needs of the audience should be the first priority of any mission worker, including TAs. Only about 30% of completed translations are well used. The initial set up of the programme needs to take SE into consideration (it's no good wai...
Post a Comment
Read more

One Person's Contextualisation is Another Person's Syncretism

I was in an interesting discussion full of anthropologists the other day. They were discussing syncretism. Most of them were of the view that outsiders cannot decide which practices are syncretistic and which are not. It has to be a decision made by local believers. This is because only local people can create indigenous theologies, that is, interpret Scripture according to the local worldview(s).  Not only that, some practices need to be tolerated in the short term, as we trust that new believers will gradually mature, and realise that those practices need to be weaned out of their lives. This can take time, perhaps years. Outsiders can, however, help local believers through the process of deciding for themselves which practices need to be rejected, which can be accepted, and which need to be modified according to (local formed) principles from Scripture. For example, ancestor practices, which my PhD thesis was on, are often continued by people after they have come to faith. They...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Problems and Pitfalls of Proof-Texting

Why is it wrong to proof-text when making an argument?  Proof-texting is when someone simply quotes a verse from the Bible, out of context, to make a point. This can be in a book, a conversation, an essay, or a sermon, to give some examples. I just did a quick read of some other blogs on this topic, and none of them wowed me, so I thought I'd write my own. Then I had an even better idea: why not get you to tell me why proof-texting is problematic? In other words, I want to crowd-source the problem, and get lots of input. Since it is my suggestion, and I already did some research, let me get the ball rolling. Proof-texting is problematic because: It ignores the original context of the verse. There are actually two types of context: The literary context of the verse, that is, the verse is situated in a passage (that might be making an entirely different point) of Scripture that has a certain genre. For instance, the book of Acts is narrative, which means it is descriptive of what hap...
3 comments
Read more