Skip to main content

Why I Joined the Bible Translation Movement

 And now for something completely different - a testimony! 

Why did I join the Bible translation movement? I often get asked this question, and it's a good one. Of course, it was a matter of calling. But how did that calling manifest itself? It's a long story...

Back in the 1980s we already knew that God had called us into mission work, but we didn't know what type of mission work he'd called us too. In my final year at university I visited Crosslinks in London, but they told me to go and get a secular job, and establish my profession, then I'd be able to use that in mission work.

We got married, settled down, and became school teachers. But we were still exploring opportunities for mission - in fact we lived in a highly multicultural city, attending a church in the inner-city area where there were a mix of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and Christians. This enabled us to continue friendship making amongst those of other faiths, whilst attending the church and building relationships with other believers.

At some point we attended a weekend at the Wycliffe Centre, as was. It was a weekend of role-plays and discussions. A lot of it was great fun. We were also asked some really good questions, such as, "What is more important, translating the Bible for a church that is asking for it, or for an unreached people group?" Well, there isn't a right answer to that question, but it got us thinking. We decided that Bible translation is one of the best ways of reaching an unreached people group, and signed up for a ten day training course in linguistics (phonetics and grammar) and Bible translation. This confirmed our ability to do translation, as our grades were high.

We then talked to our home church, who were keen to send out church planters. In the end someone from Wycliffe Bible Translators visited the elders of the church and explain to them that it is not normally possible to plant churches and translate the Bible. Often two different teams will be at work among a given people group or in a certain village, one working on church planting, the other on Bible translation.

So, off we went to All Nations for two years to study the Bible, Greek, missiology, and all kinds of other useful things (dentistry and car maintenance among them). We then studied linguistics and Bible translation at the Wycliffe Centre, and not long after that got on a plane to Central Asia (via Russia, where we learnt Russian and had some field orientation classes). Once we were abroad we became assigned to SIL.

Sadly I hear some people today saying that SIL is not primarily a Bible translation organisation. It is about languages and linguistics. That may be partly true, but we joined it to reach unreached people groups via the tool of Bible translation. That has, and always will be, our heart for mission, and our calling.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scripture Engagement for Translation Advisors

What do translation advisors need to know about Scripture engagement (SE), and why? Let's look at the 'why' first: Translation advisors (TAs) are often involved in day-to-day exegesis. They help mother-tongue translators (MTTs) prepare drafts. The MTTs they work with might not know Hebrew or Greek. The TAs then take part in the team check of that draft, which involves other MTTs in the project as well as the TA. Sometimes they are also involved in the coordination of the translation programme. They are very busy people. So why do they need to know about SE? Because: The translation is ultimately for an audience that has felt needs that are not being addressed by the translation programme. Analysing and meeting (or helping to meet) the felt needs of the audience should be the first priority of any mission worker, including TAs. Only about 30% of completed translations are well used. The initial set up of the programme needs to take SE into consideration (it's no good wai...
Post a Comment
Read more

One Person's Contextualisation is Another Person's Syncretism

I was in an interesting discussion full of anthropologists the other day. They were discussing syncretism. Most of them were of the view that outsiders cannot decide which practices are syncretistic and which are not. It has to be a decision made by local believers. This is because only local people can create indigenous theologies, that is, interpret Scripture according to the local worldview(s).  Not only that, some practices need to be tolerated in the short term, as we trust that new believers will gradually mature, and realise that those practices need to be weaned out of their lives. This can take time, perhaps years. Outsiders can, however, help local believers through the process of deciding for themselves which practices need to be rejected, which can be accepted, and which need to be modified according to (local formed) principles from Scripture. For example, ancestor practices, which my PhD thesis was on, are often continued by people after they have come to faith. They...
Post a Comment
Read more

Asset Based Bible Translation (ABBT)

Many of you will have heard of asset-based community development (ABCD). How can Bible translation programmes be asset based, rather than deficit based? The best way to look at this is a comparison table: Deficit based Asset based Driven by outsiders Driven by the community Outside funding Community funded Done to meet a need Done to help the community grow Quality control done by a consultant Community checked and approved Control from outside-in Lead by stepping back Products not accepted? Products are accepted Little engagement Engagement with products Scientific Organic Not sustainable Sustainable Of course many translation programmes these days are neither one nor t'other, they are somewhere between these two extremes. Nevertheless, this illustrates a point, and shows that the current ...
Post a Comment
Read more