Skip to main content

What is the Prosperity Gospel and Why is it So Popular?


The prosperity gospel is widely practised throughout the world, and hugely popular in Africa. It has also gained a foothold in Europe via certain modern movements that emphasise the 'health' aspect of 'health and wealth' teaching i.e. the idea that God doesn't want anyone to suffer, but for all to be healed. We are probably all familiar with TV evangelists who ask us to give, and God will reward us by giving back. The proof that it works is the large house they themselves live in, and the executive car they drive.

The trouble with this teaching is that it does not line up with the overall message of Scripture. The so-called proof texts used by prosperity teachers are often taken from the Old Testament (nothing in and of itself bad about that), turning descriptive teaching (a description of what God did then) into prescriptive ideas (God wants that to happen to everybody). "God made Abraham prosperous. He wants to make us prosperous too!"

Now, there are a lot of blogs and videos out there about prosperity teaching, so I don't want to repeat what is written and said there. Instead I have a question. Where did this teaching come from? When did it originate, and why? The answer is that it began in the early 20th century in the States, when an over-optimistic view of modern history ("things can only get better") combined with Christianity to create a mix that resulted in the prosperity gospel. This teaching spread throughout the world via mission work.

What a lot of missiologists miss, it seems to me, is that there is often something in the host culture (the culture of those in e.g. Africa) that makes this teaching very popular. Two possibilities:

  1. Poverty is a massive issue in the majority world, so prosperity teaching appeals to those wanting to climb out of the poverty trap
  2. Traditional African religion includes an emphasis on the role of ancestral spirits in a family's everyday life, which includes fertility (more children are needed to work in the fields), good harvests (if you have more crops come in then  you need to eat, you have a surplus you can sell), and protection from evil. All three of these are, or can be, included in prosperity teaching
Probably both are to some extent true. The problem with (2) is that people are likely to turn to God on a Sunday, and the ancestors Monday - Saturday. Or turn to God, and if their prayers are not answered, turn to the ancestors for help.

One of the worst results of prosperity teaching is a complete lack of a theology of suffering. I don't see how 2 Cor can make any sense if suffering is not part of God's plan for us. In 2 Cor Paul teaches that suffering and victory are inextricably linked.

This does not mean that we have to preach about suffering every Sunday. Instead, let's focus on the 'now and not yet' of the kingdom. Now we may need to suffer, but when God's kingdom is fully realised (at the second coming of our Lord Jesus the Messiah), we will never have to suffer again. Alleluia!

Image by bertin23 from Pixabay

More info here from the Lausanne movement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Reasons to Make Scripture Impact a Priority

This is a response to some recent posts about the importance of Bible translation in fulfilling the Great Commission. Yes, there is much truth in that, but more is needed. It really helps to have Scripture impact (or 'engagement') the top priority, the 'car' as it were, with translation the engine that sits beneath the bonnet. Not all drivers need to know all the details of the engine, but they need to be able to control the vehicle. The most important thing is to be able to get from A to B (see point 2), rather than knowing how the engine works. These are the ten reasons to make Scripture impact a priority: To help people flourish in their communities. There are all kinds of needs that need to be met for people to flourish. One is clean water. Another is good sanitation. Peace (lack of war), and freedom of religion. Access to education etc. etc. For a community to truly flourish they also need access to the Scriptures in a language (or languages) that they understand a...

A Flow Chart for Bible Translation (a Relevance Theory Approach)

One of the current theories behind modern translation work is Relevance Theory. [1] Here is a flow chart that explains the process often used to produce a draft when using such an approach: *Make sure your translation committee makes the decision as to what kind of translation they want. A domesticated translation is one that submits to dominant values in the target language [2] whereas a foreignized translation is one that is happy to import foreign terms and ideas from Hebrew, Greek, or the language of wider communication such as the Greek term baptizo . The chart looks something like this: Text                                   Communicated Ideas                  Context A sower went out to sow  A farmer went out to sow grain   People scattered/threw seed etc. The text has very little information, but behind i...

Asking the Right Questions in Bible Translation and Scripture Engagement Planning

If you want to get useful answers you have to ask the right questions. Do you agree? Yes, of course you do. In the Bible translation world we often ask a very narrow question when planning for the next stage of work: 'What would you like to see translated next?' Now, if you simply want to translate, and that's it, that question is fine, but what if you want to see some kind of result from your translation work? What if, for instance, you want to see transformation occur? Then a more powerful question to ask the community and positive stakeholders in the project would be: 'What kingdom goals would you like to see reached?' These kingdom goals should meet felt needs of the community - they should solve problems that are apparent to most or all in the community. See below on how those can be met. If that's too abstract, then try, 'What kinds of things, in your extended family, do you tend to worry about?' This will help establish some felt needs, from which...