Skip to main content

Worldview

A community's worldview is a description of its perspectives on the world (the spectacles through which it views the world), and its underlying beliefs and assumptions behind its cultural practices.^ These are often called presuppositions, as they are held, but rarely stated. One simply way of comparing worldviews of different groups is to ask some basic questions, such as:

  1. Who am I?
  2. Where am I (what is the world like)?
  3. What is the problem?
  4. What is the solution?
For instance, a secular-materialistic worldview would look something like this:
  1. I am the random product of a genetic process that began with the formation of basic forms of life such as amoebas, and continued until human beings came into being via the process called 'evolution'.
  2. I am in the world that was formed by the big bang. This possibly occurred as the result of a massive singularity, though there are several other current theories about this. Scientists can trace the big bang back to the first few nanoseconds, but not beyond the big bang. Perhaps time only began when the big bang occurred? No one is quite sure about this, though.
  3. The problem is the meaningless of a life lived for such a short time. We are born, live, die, then there is nothing. Perhaps we become part of the cosmos, but most of us just believe we cease to exist (at a conscious level).
  4. There is no solution, though most of find it is better to live in the moment, using principles of mindfulness. This at least makes each moment more worthwhile than it otherwise would be. Also, we have meaningful relationships, though ultimately these will cease to exist when one of us dies. Again, all we can do is enjoy them while we have them. Sometimes the threat of death can make us feel more alive, as we then live every moment as if it is our last.
Followers of Jesus the Messiah believe that our life is only meaningful when lived in and through him (via the Holy Spirit, who lives in each believer). Instead of a secular-materialist worldview, followers of the Messiah believe: 
  1. I am created by God, and loved by him.
  2. The universe was created by God, and was seen by him to be 'good' (Genesis 1).
  3. The problem is that human beings rebelled against God and were expelled from paradise (Genesis 2-3).
  4. The solution is in God's plan to rescue people from every nation, by choosing one nation, Israel. They were intended to be 'light to the nations' (Isaiah 49:6), but chose, instead, to focus on their own destiny. As a result of their continued rebellion against their God, Yahweh,* they ended up in exile, and only a small number of true believers returned to Judah (southern Israel). They then lived under various empires (Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Roman). While the Romans were in charge Jesus came, and instead of causing a political rebellion against the Roman rulers on behalf of his people, the Judeans, he brought in a Kingdom where God rules in our hearts and in the life of our community or 'gathering'. His death and resurrection proved that he was chosen by God, and enabled all of creation to be reconciled with God (Colossians 1-2). It also reunited heaven and earth, which therefore means that all believers who become part of God's Kingdom are essentially living in heaven, as well as on earth, and have eternal life. In the future, Jesus the Messiah will return in power and glory, and claim his inheritance, which is believers from every tribe, nation, language and tongue (Revelation 7). The death and resurrection of the Messiah also enabled Judeans and Gentiles (those from non-Judean nations) to be reconciled (Ephesians 2), as both are saved in and through the work of the Messiah.
As you can see, the difference between the secular-materialistic worldview and the Christian one is large. This means that when we share our beliefs (that is, our worldview) with those from a secular-materialist background, they find it difficult to comprehend it or see the relevance of it to their lives.

One solution is to begin where they are, by suggesting that they read the book of Ecclesiastes, which discusses the meaningless of a life lived without God. This will enable them to see that the Bible, far from being irrelevant, speaks directly into their life and enables them to find a path to belief. 

This process can be used as a model to reach out to those with other worldviews, as well. Answer the four questions above, from their perspective, then try to find out what might resonate with them, in terms of Scriptural truth. For Muslims, it is often the book of Proverbs, or certain Psalms. For Hindus, it might be that Jesus, through his death and resurrection, won the victory over the powers and authorities in the heavenly realms. What is it that will help them overcome their worst fears, and meet their deepest needs? That is what we need to present to communities who are searching for a more fulfilling life.

^A more formal definition can be found in Nash (1992), quoted in Moreau (2000, 1032): 'A worldview, then, is a conceptual scheme by which we consciously or unconsciously place or fit everything we believe and by which we interpret and judge reality.'
*Yahweh literally means 'He is'. Judeans often pronounce it 'Adonai', which means 'Lord', to avoid taking His name in vain. This Judean tradition has been followed by most English Bibles, which therefore translate Yahweh using the word 'Lord'.

Nash, R. H. 1992. Worldviews in Conflict: Choosing Christianity in a World of Ideas. Zondervan Academic.
Moreau, A. Scott, Harold A. Netland, Charles Edward van Engen, and David Burnett, eds. 2000. Evangelical Dictionary of World Missions. Baker Reference Library. Baker Books [u.a.].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Flow Chart for Bible Translation (a Relevance Theory Approach)

One of the current theories behind modern translation work is Relevance Theory. [1] Here is a flow chart that explains the process often used to produce a draft when using such an approach: *Make sure your translation committee makes the decision as to what kind of translation they want. A domesticated translation is one that submits to dominant values in the target language [2] whereas a foreignized translation is one that is happy to import foreign terms and ideas from Hebrew, Greek, or the language of wider communication such as the Greek term baptizo . The chart looks something like this: Text                                   Communicated Ideas                  Context A sower went out to sow  A farmer went out to sow grain   People scattered/threw seed etc. The text has very little information, but behind i...

Asset Based Bible Translation (ABBT)

Many of you will have heard of asset-based community development (ABCD). How can Bible translation programmes be asset based, rather than deficit based? The best way to look at this is a comparison table: Deficit based Asset based Driven by outsiders Driven by the community Outside funding Community funded Done to meet a need Done to help the community grow Quality control done by a consultant Community checked and approved Control from outside-in Lead by stepping back Products not accepted? Products are accepted Little engagement Engagement with products Scientific Organic Not sustainable Sustainable Of course many translation programmes these days are neither one nor t'other, they are somewhere between these two extremes. Nevertheless, this illustrates a point, and shows that the current ...

Integral Mission vs. Holistic Mission - What's the Difference?

 A lot of people are talking about integral mission these days, whereas the idea of holistic mission seems to have fallen by the wayside. What's the difference? Holistic mission is mission to the whole person, taking into account their physical as well as spiritual needs. Evangelism is combined with social action. Unfortunately, this term has been used for some years now, and much mission that was labelled 'holistic' was mainly social action. Integral mission has more focus on communities and their felt needs. What issues of poverty and (lack of) justice are there? How can a given community begin to address these issues? What input do they need from outsiders as they do so? How can they define kingdom goals that will bring them out of their physical and spiritual poverty? Lausanne defines it here . The fact is that the neediest communities are often ones that lack the Bible, and lack a clear orthography (alphabet corresponding to the phonemic system of the language, and tha...