Skip to main content

The Dividing Wall of Hostility Between Jews and Gentiles

In Ephesians 2:11-22, Paul mentions the dividing wall of hostility, that is the wall that used to divide Jews and Gentiles:

'Therefore remember that at one time you Gentiles in the flesh, called “the uncircumcision” by what is called the circumcision, which is made in the flesh by hands— remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in his flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place of the two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross, thereby killing the hostility. And he came and preached peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near. For through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father. So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord. In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit.'

This wall had, as it were, been made artificially higher in Jesus' day. The Jewish leaders had gained permission from their Roman overlords to kill anyone who entered the inner courts of the temple. There was actually a sign put up warning Gentiles not to enter the Jerusalem temple - on pain of death!

Not only that, 'Paul writes this letter from prison because he has been falsely charged with taking a non-Jew inside the temple in Jerusalem (Acts 21:28).'* So a law made by people, that wasn't even part of the Torah, was causing Paul to have to sit in prison writing letters to churches rather than being able to visit them in person (though that was ultimately to our benefit, for it turns out he was adding to the writings that made up Second Testament).

No longer are the bloody sacrifices, ritual purity, and circumcision essential for the worship of God

How did Jesus destroy this barrier? By dying on the cross. 'By his death on the cross, Jesus has fulfilled the law and thus brought to an end the ceremonies and rituals associated with the temple. No longer are the bloody sacrifices, ritual purity, and circumcision essential for the worship of God.'**

So Paul is most likely referring to the detailed commandments about rituals, sacrifices and the rite of passage that made a man Jewish, i.e. circumcision (what is 'made in the flesh by [human] hands' Eph 2:11). All of these kinds of laws are 'fulfilled' by Christ on the cross in the sense that his one perfect sacrifice made an end to them.

There are, however, laws written in the Torah that continue to be relevant to us today. In fact much of the First Testament is fulfilled by pointing to Christ (i.e. to the Messiah). This means we still read it and enjoy seeing a preview of what is to come, that is the salvation that God is going to bring about, just as he saved his chosen people the Hebrews from slavery in Egypt.

Notice too, that according to Ephesians 2, Gentiles haven't been added to Jews or vice versa. Instead Christ has created 'one new man' i.e., a new humanity. Both Jews and Gentiles are now at peace with God and at peace with each other through what Christ achieved on the cross, and are part of a new community that belongs to God, made up of both Jews and Gentiles!

What a pity it is when humans make up new laws, and stir up hostility between peoples. This undermines the work that Christ has achieved by his death and resurrection. Through him a change has come about that operates at a cosmic level. This means that any barriers between people groups are a case of reverting to the old way of operating, when the Jewish leaders sought to prevent Gentiles coming too near the presence of the Lord, who is 'enthroned between the cherubs' (Isa 37:16). Such Gentiles, according to the book of Isaiah, had been prophesied to come to the Lord as a result of the 'light' shone out by the Jews - or failing that, by the servant leader (Messiah) representing them (Isa 49:6). Oh the irony!

So, that dividing wall of hostility has been removed, and there is good news for all, and this creates peace for all humanity, just as the shepherds learnt from the angels at the time of Christ's birth (Luke 2:10).


Scripture quote from: The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), p. Eph 2:11–22

*Keener, Craig S., The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1993), p. Eph 2:14–16

**Arnold, Clinton E., Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary: Romans to Philemon. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2002), III, 317

Picture also from Arnold, Clinton E., Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary: Romans to Philemon. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2002), III, 317.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scripture Engagement for Translation Advisors

What do translation advisors need to know about Scripture engagement (SE), and why? Let's look at the 'why' first: Translation advisors (TAs) are often involved in day-to-day exegesis. They help mother-tongue translators (MTTs) prepare drafts. The MTTs they work with might not know Hebrew or Greek. The TAs then take part in the team check of that draft, which involves other MTTs in the project as well as the TA. Sometimes they are also involved in the coordination of the translation programme. They are very busy people. So why do they need to know about SE? Because: The translation is ultimately for an audience that has felt needs that are not being addressed by the translation programme. Analysing and meeting (or helping to meet) the felt needs of the audience should be the first priority of any mission worker, including TAs. Only about 30% of completed translations are well used. The initial set up of the programme needs to take SE into consideration (it's no good wai...

One Person's Contextualisation is Another Person's Syncretism

I was in an interesting discussion full of anthropologists the other day. They were discussing syncretism. Most of them were of the view that outsiders cannot decide which practices are syncretistic and which are not. It has to be a decision made by local believers. This is because only local people can create indigenous theologies, that is, interpret Scripture according to the local worldview(s).  Not only that, some practices need to be tolerated in the short term, as we trust that new believers will gradually mature, and realise that those practices need to be weaned out of their lives. This can take time, perhaps years. Outsiders can, however, help local believers through the process of deciding for themselves which practices need to be rejected, which can be accepted, and which need to be modified according to (local formed) principles from Scripture. For example, ancestor practices, which my PhD thesis was on, are often continued by people after they have come to faith. They...

The Problems and Pitfalls of Proof-Texting

Why is it wrong to proof-text when making an argument?  Proof-texting is when someone simply quotes a verse from the Bible, out of context, to make a point. This can be in a book, a conversation, an essay, or a sermon, to give some examples. I just did a quick read of some other blogs on this topic, and none of them wowed me, so I thought I'd write my own. Then I had an even better idea: why not get you to tell me why proof-texting is problematic? In other words, I want to crowd-source the problem, and get lots of input. Since it is my suggestion, and I already did some research, let me get the ball rolling. Proof-texting is problematic because: It ignores the original context of the verse. There are actually two types of context: The literary context of the verse, that is, the verse is situated in a passage (that might be making an entirely different point) of Scripture that has a certain genre. For instance, the book of Acts is narrative, which means it is descriptive of what hap...