Skip to main content

Community Testing Your Translation (and why Scripture engagement is linked to this)


We all now the importance of community checking (or testing) a translation. This is where members of the team (but not the translators) go out into the community to test a translation, to see if it is understood, often using Katy Barnwell's '10 Ways of Testing Your Translation.' If you haven't read it yet, do read it now.

Community Checking and Scripture Engagement

So, what is the connection between community testing and Scripture engagement (SE)? There are several things that can be said about this:

  • Community checks are a good way of gaining legitimacy or acceptance of your translation amongst the community. They've had input, so now they have had their say, their feel they own the translation
  • It's not about a product it's about a process - building relationships with the community which will lead to SE
  • Some of the methods of community checking overlap hugely with SE, namely Listening to Readers (or to those giving their voices to audio recordings), Tell it Again, Trial Version(s), and Use of the Translation in Bible Study Groups. All four methods are commonly used by SE workers as they work with communities
  • Searching for opportunities for community checking your translation can be the same as searching for SE options
  • If you are working in an area where people have smartphones, why not test the translation using Social media? Or by making a Bible App, which can be updated with the final version of the text? (Apps can be set to expire on a certain date unless updated)
  • If you are sitting in a room, as a translation team, or working virtually as a team, how is anyone ever going to hear about the translation? Why would they read it when it comes out, if they have never heard of it while it was going on?
So, it's really important to have your translation community checked, as it helps to build those relationships that are needed between the team and the community, and gain trust, and begin SE work amongst the community. Without community checks, your translation may never be used.

Remember that it is the translation you are testing, not the testing respondents. Whatever a respondent says is the correct answer, in that they have understood it in a certain way and we want to find out why that is, and if necessary correct the translation to make it make sense.

When Community Checking is Hard

What if community checking is difficult where you are working because of limited access to the community? It doesn't mean you can skip this important step in your translation process. Why not? Because there are always ways to test a translation. You can ask friends about certain key terms e.g. which word do they use for 'God' when they are praying to him (give them a list of alternatives)? What do they think the purpose of sacrifice is? Friends will be happy to answer those kinds of questions. Also, it is possible to carry out community checking with members of diaspora communities.

If you find it hard to carry out community checking, the most important checking methods are:

  1. The Tell-it-Again test
  2. Asking comprehension questions ('Questions and Answers')
  3. Back Translations into a Language of Wider Communication
So, if you have to skip anything, skip some of the other methods, but do make sure you carry out community checks!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scripture Engagement for Translation Advisors

What do translation advisors need to know about Scripture engagement (SE), and why? Let's look at the 'why' first: Translation advisors (TAs) are often involved in day-to-day exegesis. They help mother-tongue translators (MTTs) prepare drafts. The MTTs they work with might not know Hebrew or Greek. The TAs then take part in the team check of that draft, which involves other MTTs in the project as well as the TA. Sometimes they are also involved in the coordination of the translation programme. They are very busy people. So why do they need to know about SE? Because: The translation is ultimately for an audience that has felt needs that are not being addressed by the translation programme. Analysing and meeting (or helping to meet) the felt needs of the audience should be the first priority of any mission worker, including TAs. Only about 30% of completed translations are well used. The initial set up of the programme needs to take SE into consideration (it's no good wai...
Post a Comment
Read more

One Person's Contextualisation is Another Person's Syncretism

I was in an interesting discussion full of anthropologists the other day. They were discussing syncretism. Most of them were of the view that outsiders cannot decide which practices are syncretistic and which are not. It has to be a decision made by local believers. This is because only local people can create indigenous theologies, that is, interpret Scripture according to the local worldview(s).  Not only that, some practices need to be tolerated in the short term, as we trust that new believers will gradually mature, and realise that those practices need to be weaned out of their lives. This can take time, perhaps years. Outsiders can, however, help local believers through the process of deciding for themselves which practices need to be rejected, which can be accepted, and which need to be modified according to (local formed) principles from Scripture. For example, ancestor practices, which my PhD thesis was on, are often continued by people after they have come to faith. They...
Post a Comment
Read more

Asset Based Bible Translation (ABBT)

Many of you will have heard of asset-based community development (ABCD). How can Bible translation programmes be asset based, rather than deficit based? The best way to look at this is a comparison table: Deficit based Asset based Driven by outsiders Driven by the community Outside funding Community funded Done to meet a need Done to help the community grow Quality control done by a consultant Community checked and approved Control from outside-in Lead by stepping back Products not accepted? Products are accepted Little engagement Engagement with products Scientific Organic Not sustainable Sustainable Of course many translation programmes these days are neither one nor t'other, they are somewhere between these two extremes. Nevertheless, this illustrates a point, and shows that the current ...
Post a Comment
Read more