Skip to main content

3D Gospel: How Does it Line Up with the Three Major Worldviews?

Jayson Georges, in his book '3D Gospel' suggests there are three sets of dynamics in Scripture and also in worldviews that people use as a framework when interpreting Scripture, and especially when understanding the gospel:

  1. Innocence-guilt. This the one any Westerner will have grown up with. The big question is, 'How can sins be paid for?' I'll let John Piper explain the rest: What is the Gospel? 
  2. Honour-shame. This is much less individualistic than the one above. The big question is, 'How can honour in the family be restored?' The family, in terms of Scripture, is the descendants of Jacob, and, by extension, the whole of humanity. All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Rom 3.23). Gentiles were excluded from the covenant (Eph 2) but have now been included. The barrier between Jew and Gentile has been broken down. We are fellow citizens, with them. Jesus, as our older brother, has regained the honour he always deserved, and shares it with us, his family.
  3. Power-fear. There are forces of evil at work in the world, that need warding off, or better still, defeating. The big question is, 'How can evil be defeated?' The power-fear gospel describes how victory was won, and Satan defeated. We are now seated in Christ in the heavenly realms (Eph 1). There are still ongoing battles but the ultimate victory is assured. Sometimes evil becomes almost tangible e.g. Elijah and the prophets of Baal (1Kings 18), or Jesus casting out the demons into the pigs (Mat 8). There is a spiritual battle going on, but we are fighting on the winning side.
Barbara Fisher has a look at a worldviews in her study here. From a religious perspective, she isolates three major worldviews in the world:
  1. Naturalism—with its ‘loose’ sub-groups of agnosticism, atheism, existentialism, Marxism, materialism and secular humanism. 
  2. Theism—which may be divided into Christianity, Islam and Judaism; all of which are monotheistic. 
  3. Pantheism—which includes Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism and New Age.
How do these line up with the 3D Gospel paradigms above? I would like to suggest that the Enlightenment has so affected Western worldview that it has invaded the Western church too, and therefore 1. Naturalism is found in parts of the world where Innocence-guilt dynamics are predominant. Number 3 Pantheism lines up nicely with Power-fear. This leaves 2. Theism to line up with Honour-Shame. We end up with this table:

Naturalism:    Innocence-Guilt
Theism:          Honour-Shame
Pantheism:     Power-fear

This is, of course, a huge over-simplification of the case. Where folk religions are involved no. 3 Power-fear/Pantheism is bound to be hugely influential. As I wrote earlier, the West is a heady concoction of at least two of these: naturalism (innocence-guilt) and theism (honour-shame). It also has many elements of 3. pantheism (power-fear), especially in parts of society affected by the new age movement.

So, what I'm suggesting is that the honour-shame dynamics found in the Bible are key. They are more important than the innocence-guilt dynamics that come, not so much from the Bible (though it is there too) but from the Enlightenment, influenced as it was by Greek philosophy (which is also there in some parts of the Bible). After all logic, rules, and the law court all stem from the Greek system. Many systematic theologies developed in Europe in the 16th-18th centuries began with a Greek philosophical grid. They asked Greek questions of the Scriptures. The understood terms like 'the law' in a particular way. Human reasoning was applied, as best as they were able, to the Bible, in order to find out answers to very innocence-guilt kinds of questions. It is no surprise that they missed some of the honour-shame and power-fear dynamics found in the Bible. It is good that as we have come to understand other cultures round the world, it has alerted us to this lack, and we are able to see more clearly, though still 'through a glass, darkened' (1Corinthians 13).



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 Reasons to Make Scripture Impact a Priority

This is a response to some recent posts about the importance of Bible translation in fulfilling the Great Commission. Yes, there is much truth in that, but more is needed. It really helps to have Scripture impact (or 'engagement') the top priority, the 'car' as it were, with translation the engine that sits beneath the bonnet. Not all drivers need to know all the details of the engine, but they need to be able to control the vehicle. The most important thing is to be able to get from A to B (see point 2), rather than knowing how the engine works. These are the ten reasons to make Scripture impact a priority: To help people flourish in their communities. There are all kinds of needs that need to be met for people to flourish. One is clean water. Another is good sanitation. Peace (lack of war), and freedom of religion. Access to education etc. etc. For a community to truly flourish they also need access to the Scriptures in a language (or languages) that they understand a...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Flow Chart for Bible Translation (a Relevance Theory Approach)

One of the current theories behind modern translation work is Relevance Theory. [1] Here is a flow chart that explains the process often used to produce a draft when using such an approach: *Make sure your translation committee makes the decision as to what kind of translation they want. A domesticated translation is one that submits to dominant values in the target language [2] whereas a foreignized translation is one that is happy to import foreign terms and ideas from Hebrew, Greek, or the language of wider communication such as the Greek term baptizo . The chart looks something like this: Text                                   Communicated Ideas                  Context A sower went out to sow  A farmer went out to sow grain   People scattered/threw seed etc. The text has very little information, but behind i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Asking the Right Questions in Bible Translation and Scripture Engagement Planning

If you want to get useful answers you have to ask the right questions. Do you agree? Yes, of course you do. In the Bible translation world we often ask a very narrow question when planning for the next stage of work: 'What would you like to see translated next?' Now, if you simply want to translate, and that's it, that question is fine, but what if you want to see some kind of result from your translation work? What if, for instance, you want to see transformation occur? Then a more powerful question to ask the community and positive stakeholders in the project would be: 'What kingdom goals would you like to see reached?' These kingdom goals should meet felt needs of the community - they should solve problems that are apparent to most or all in the community. See below on how those can be met. If that's too abstract, then try, 'What kinds of things, in your extended family, do you tend to worry about?' This will help establish some felt needs, from which...
7 comments
Read more