Skip to main content

Our Digital Scripture Access & Engagement Strategy

I recently asked the Scripture Engagement team which of the above (see graphic) we do well and which not so well. Their answer? We do production well, publishing and distribution fairly well, promotion not so well, and engagement hardly at all. The fact is that if we are going to produce digital Scriptures, we need not only to publish and distribute them, but to promote them and see the intended audience engage well with them. Often, even those of us producing a lot of digital Scriptures, find ourselves on a kind of treadmill where we produce a product, then go straight onto the next, without thinking about these other steps. Make sure the products are being promoted on Social media (vk.ru, ok.ru, Instagram, Facebook... ) and that someone is following up on those who take a regular interest in them. If we get likes, re-shares and comments that's great! If people are commenting again and again that's even better! Testing is another good way of getting feedback, so make sure someone is doing a good job of that crucial stage.

Notice too that the graphic shows a cycle. It's not a one way process with steps 1-4. The engagement leads back into production. We have now got feedback as to what people like, what they want, what they want to see improved. Perhaps we have encountered some opposition, and need to think about how to either counter that or modify our future products so they are less confrontational. This is the difference between 'push' and 'pull' strategies mentioned in the report. If we 'push' we are just producing products and hoping people like them. With a 'pull' strategy we're finding out what people like beforehand, or using feedback from the audience to modify what we produce. Having said that, don't be afraid to use not only bridges, but door-openers, things that people find attractive, despite the fact they are not found in the teaching they have encountered in their youth. E.g. the miracles of Jesus can really fascinate people (Muslims, for instance, often only know one miracle of Jesus, and that is from the false Gospel of Thomas - the miracle where Jesus is supposed to have breathed life into a clay bird and it flies away - so they often love hearing about other miracles).

And don't forget that you might, in fact, have several audiences. There are people who live in villages. Those who lives in urban areas, who are both multilingual and au fait with technology. Then there are the diaspora, some of whom are desperate to keep in contact with their home culture. So it's good to get feedback from all three audiences.

Lastly, don't forget that the DBL is a great place to put your products, along with websites like Scripture Earth. This ensures that our partners (other agencies working with the same audience) can access the materials we produce. It's also likely that the diaspora are searching for materials, and might find them on your website, but they also might find them on Scripture Earth.

We're often so busy in production we forget about most of the other stages, but if our goal is to see transformed lives as folk engage with the Scriptures, then we need to readjust the time we spend, and focus more on promotion and engagement.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

One Person's Contextualisation is Another Person's Syncretism

I was in an interesting discussion full of anthropologists the other day. They were discussing syncretism. Most of them were of the view that outsiders cannot decide which practices are syncretistic and which are not. It has to be a decision made by local believers. This is because only local people can create indigenous theologies, that is, interpret Scripture according to the local worldview(s).  Not only that, some practices need to be tolerated in the short term, as we trust that new believers will gradually mature, and realise that those practices need to be weaned out of their lives. This can take time, perhaps years. Outsiders can, however, help local believers through the process of deciding for themselves which practices need to be rejected, which can be accepted, and which need to be modified according to (local formed) principles from Scripture. For example, ancestor practices, which my PhD thesis was on, are often continued by people after they have come to faith. They...
Post a Comment
Read more

Scripture Engagement for Translation Advisors

What do translation advisors need to know about Scripture engagement (SE), and why? Let's look at the 'why' first: Translation advisors (TAs) are often involved in day-to-day exegesis. They help mother-tongue translators (MTTs) prepare drafts. The MTTs they work with might not know Hebrew or Greek. The TAs then take part in the team check of that draft, which involves other MTTs in the project as well as the TA. Sometimes they are also involved in the coordination of the translation programme. They are very busy people. So why do they need to know about SE? Because: The translation is ultimately for an audience that has felt needs that are not being addressed by the translation programme. Analysing and meeting (or helping to meet) the felt needs of the audience should be the first priority of any mission worker, including TAs. Only about 30% of completed translations are well used. The initial set up of the programme needs to take SE into consideration (it's no good wai...
Post a Comment
Read more

Asset Based Bible Translation (ABBT)

Many of you will have heard of asset-based community development (ABCD). How can Bible translation programmes be asset based, rather than deficit based? The best way to look at this is a comparison table: Deficit based Asset based Driven by outsiders Driven by the community Outside funding Community funded Done to meet a need Done to help the community grow Quality control done by a consultant Community checked and approved Control from outside-in Lead by stepping back Products not accepted? Products are accepted Little engagement Engagement with products Scientific Organic Not sustainable Sustainable Of course many translation programmes these days are neither one nor t'other, they are somewhere between these two extremes. Nevertheless, this illustrates a point, and shows that the current ...
Post a Comment
Read more