Skip to main content

Rescuing Paul from Individualism: what Romans 6 and 7 are really talking about

'The book of Romans wasn't written by Luther. The book of Romans wasn't even written by Calvin. The book of Romans was written by Paul, and Paul was a Jew, and we Jews, don't like Gentiles!' Martin Goldsmith, All Nations Christian College, 1991-92.

We are so used to reading Romans through the eyes of Luther and Calvin that we forget that the reason it was written was quite different from the issues those venerable theologians faced. The problem, from a Jewish perspective, is that the Gentiles were considered to be so impure as to be beyond the bounds of God's saving grace. They were the uncircumcised, sexually immoral, idolatrous, unclean people who couldn't possibly by part of God's saving plan. But God's plan did include them (Gen 12:1-3), and Isaiah, amongst others, prophesied that 'all nations' would be included in temple worship (Isa 56:6-8). In this he was correct. Jesus' resurrection and ascension changed everything. No longer was the message for Judeans only, but also for Greeks (Rom 1). 

Now, I don't know about you, but I've always struggled to understand Romans chapters 6-7. Why does Paul suddenly seem to get introspective? Well the answer, it seems, is that he isn't be introspective, so much as historical.

Paul, in his genius, argued that although the Gentile nations seemed to be much worse than those from Judea, in fact Judeans were just as much in need of God's saving grace. Why was this? Because the teaching of the Torah, and the rest of the Hebrew Bible, can't, in and of itself, save you. Neither can belonging to the in-crowd via the custom of circumcision. None of these things actually save us - only faith in Jesus the Messiah. But this faith is not an individual faith. The whole of the community who were in Christ (part of the Messianic Judaeo-Greek world), were included in a new people of God who were chosen, pure, forgiven, and so on. Peter actually puts this more clearly than Paul:

But you are a chosen racea royal priesthooda holy nationa people of his own, so that you may proclaim the virtues[aa] of the one who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. 10 You once were not a people, but now you are God’s people. You were shown no mercy,[ac] but now you have received mercy. (aa This verse contains various allusions and quotations from Exod 19:5-623:22 (LXX); Isa 43:20-21; and Mal 3:17. ac The quotations in v. 10 are from Hos 1:692:23.)

In Romans 6-7, therefore, Paul is talking about himself as Judean, who has had to die to the law in the sense of relying on it for salvation, in order to be part of this new people, who are in Christ (the Messiah). Salvation is in Christ, not in Judaism. Our ethnic identity is so much smaller than our identity in Christ.  In 7:7-25 the 'I' that has caused so much debate is Paul the representative of his people, the Judeans. He, as a Judean, cannot be saved through the Old Testament, but only in Christ. Likewise all Judeans. Likewise all Gentiles.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Reasons to Make Scripture Impact a Priority

This is a response to some recent posts about the importance of Bible translation in fulfilling the Great Commission. Yes, there is much truth in that, but more is needed. It really helps to have Scripture impact (or 'engagement') the top priority, the 'car' as it were, with translation the engine that sits beneath the bonnet. Not all drivers need to know all the details of the engine, but they need to be able to control the vehicle. The most important thing is to be able to get from A to B (see point 2), rather than knowing how the engine works. These are the ten reasons to make Scripture impact a priority: To help people flourish in their communities. There are all kinds of needs that need to be met for people to flourish. One is clean water. Another is good sanitation. Peace (lack of war), and freedom of religion. Access to education etc. etc. For a community to truly flourish they also need access to the Scriptures in a language (or languages) that they understand a...

A Flow Chart for Bible Translation (a Relevance Theory Approach)

One of the current theories behind modern translation work is Relevance Theory. [1] Here is a flow chart that explains the process often used to produce a draft when using such an approach: *Make sure your translation committee makes the decision as to what kind of translation they want. A domesticated translation is one that submits to dominant values in the target language [2] whereas a foreignized translation is one that is happy to import foreign terms and ideas from Hebrew, Greek, or the language of wider communication such as the Greek term baptizo . The chart looks something like this: Text                                   Communicated Ideas                  Context A sower went out to sow  A farmer went out to sow grain   People scattered/threw seed etc. The text has very little information, but behind i...

Asking the Right Questions in Bible Translation and Scripture Engagement Planning

If you want to get useful answers you have to ask the right questions. Do you agree? Yes, of course you do. In the Bible translation world we often ask a very narrow question when planning for the next stage of work: 'What would you like to see translated next?' Now, if you simply want to translate, and that's it, that question is fine, but what if you want to see some kind of result from your translation work? What if, for instance, you want to see transformation occur? Then a more powerful question to ask the community and positive stakeholders in the project would be: 'What kingdom goals would you like to see reached?' These kingdom goals should meet felt needs of the community - they should solve problems that are apparent to most or all in the community. See below on how those can be met. If that's too abstract, then try, 'What kinds of things, in your extended family, do you tend to worry about?' This will help establish some felt needs, from which...